News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Bylong group backs call for mine 'no go' zone 

Bylong group backs call for mine 'no go' zone

18 Apr, 2011 09:02 AM
The Bylong Valley Protection Alliance (BVPA) has joined Mid-Western Regional Council in calling for the greater Bylong Valley area to be declared a “no go” zone for coal and coal seam gas mining.

In its submission to Department of Planning on the NSW Coal and Gas Strategy scoping paper, the BVPA has argued the Greater Bylong Valley should have been deemed to be “prime agricultural land” and protected from mining under amendments to the Mining Act proposed by the Greens in 2009.

The amendments were defeated by a single vote in the NSW Upper House.

BVPA interim secretary Craig Shaw said the group felt it was important to look at protecting more high quality agricultural land than that which is currently used very productively.

“Just protecting the Liverpool Plains doesn’t do much to help ‘future proof’ food security,” Mr Shaw said.

“We need to be protecting, in advance, areas of innately good quality – such as the Bylong Valley – where production would be able to be increased dramatically in years to come as food demand rises.”

The BVPA submission also calls for stronger protection for rivers and streams near mining developments, especially those near national parks.

The group has urged the Coalition Government to adopt Labor’s pre-election commitment to ban exploration in waterways next to national parks and remove exploration licences on waterways in close proximity to national parks.

The group is also calling for current guidelines regarding how close mine developments can be to streams to be made mandatory.

The BVPA submission notes the “decimation of Wollar” and other villages as a result of mining development, as an example of the flow-on effects of mining on communities.

“In our submission we have noted, as a particular example, the impact on Rural Fire Service brigades and the resulting increase in risks associated with bushfires through lack of adequate manpower and equipment,” Mr Shaw said.

“A strategy is required to maintain or improve fire fighting capacity, rather than see it eroded.”

The BVPA has supported the Mid-Western Regional Council’s submission to the scoping paper.

“Council has shown outstanding leadership on mining and related issues in the region, including their calls for the protection of the Bylong Valley,” Mr Shaw said.

“We – and I’m sure many others – are very grateful for their support.”

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Prime Agricultural land, you mean the stuff the farmers have been spraying poison on for the last 60 to 80 years? These NIMBY claims by these groups forget the simple logic, if you say everywhere but here, you are actually saying that it is ok, but that you are special. If these activities can not be conducted on prime land, then they are also to dirty to be done anywhere else. What is so special about Bylong, it is just another place, no matter how rich the land owners there are.
Posted by Graeme Henderson, 18/04/2011 1:37:05 PM, on Mudgee Guardian
I agree with you 100% Graeme. Coal mining IS too dirty to be done anywhere and it is time to reconsider its place in our economy. Coal mining is not the long term future of this or any other region. It gives short term "gain" for long term pain, and I have grand children.
Posted by Mike, 19/04/2011 11:50:54 PM, on Mudgee Guardian
@GraemeH,

Your attempt to turn the situation around and paint the Bylong Farmers as the rich selfish ones that have ruined and polluted their own land and won't share their not so special place as more cheap Pro Coal Spin.

When it comes to corporate greed, pollution, destruction and a self interested self importance nothing exceeds Mining as your twisted spin clearly shows. So you think people will realy believe that the farmers fighting to save their own patch don't care about other areas, what a lot of rot, as there are no central power brokers like the Minierals Council & the international Pro Mining loby fighting on the side of the Farmers they can only fight their own battles and send their best wishes & moral support to other communities facing destruction by the Multinational Miners. How dare you suggest that they are selfish & uncaring and have poisoned the land so it should be turned over to "good caring" Miners. You're joking I asume when you think the last 60 to 80yrs of mining in the Hunter Valley that is now trashed and useless is more desirable in your eyes than the land and water used indefinately for generations of farming.

Not Nimbyism, just a fight to survive.


Posted by SPARKS, 28/04/2011 1:24:58 PM, on Mudgee Guardian

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles




Mudgee Guardian







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...