News 
 National News 
 National 
 General 
 Kate Middleton downsized in wedding photo 

Kate Middleton downsized in wedding photo

12 Aug, 2011 02:05 PM

The UK edition of Grazia magazine has admitted it slimmed the waist of Kate Middleton by digitally altering a cover image of her on her wedding day.

In its 9 May edition the weekly fashion title published a photograph of what appeared to be an impossibly thin Duchess of Cambridge standing alone in her bridal gown.

The image has reignited the debate over the use of digital manipulation in women's magazines.

After investigating a complaint to the press watchdog that the image had been manipulated, the Bauer Media-owned magazine has conceded that it doctored the original image of William and Kate leaving Westminster cathedral.

''The magazine explained how the image had been altered to remove the arm of Prince William so that the duchess could be featured on the cover alone," The Press Complaints Commission said.

"This involved mirroring one of the duchess's arms and an inadvertent result of the change was the slimming of her waist.''

Grazia said it had wanted a "great image" of the duchess on her own but "all the photographs had the duke in too."

"So we asked our reproduction house to remove him from the picture (common practice among glossy magazines)," Grazia said.

"This would have left the duchess with only one arm, so they copied over her arm to complete the picture.

''[Grazia] would like to reassure all our readers that we did not purposely make any alterations to the Duchess of Cambridge's image to make her appear slimmer, and we are sorry if this process gave that impression''.

The duchess is not the first to have her image electronically altered by a glossy magazine.

Kate Winslet, renowned for celebrating her curvy figure, has fallen foul of the airbrush on more than one occasion.

In 2003 the editor of GQ admitted digitally lengthening and slimming her legs for a cover shoot in which she posed in a basque and high heels.

The actress protested that she ''was pretty proud of how my legs actually looked in the real picture''.

Last month L'Oreal was forced to withdraw ads for the Eraser foundation featuring Julia Roberts and model Christy Turlington after admitting the images had been digitally retouched.

Four years earlier advertising watchdogs criticised the French firm for a mascara advert in which Penelope Cruz wore false eyelashes.

The Guardian

Follow Life&Style on Twitter @Life_Style_News

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Well buy your photographer a better telephoto lens you morons,.......bloody hell this is riveting stuff,...much more important than "Boat People" wacking it over us once again.
Posted by Birdman, 12/08/2011 9:48:36 PM
Bull. Its taken more than mirroring Kate's arm to give her the Barbie doll proportions. As just flipping the arm from right to left, gives her the same dimensions. Her figure in the Grazia cover photo has also been narrowed from the waist and down the skirt.
Posted by Natasha Watson, 13/08/2011 2:54:41 AM
everything was publish by media is not true its all about lie nobody's perfect in this world and beauty is on the eye of the beholder.
Posted by jill, 6/09/2011 3:00:14 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Digital diet ... Grazia admits to inadvertently slimming Kate Middleton's waist.
Digital diet ... Grazia admits to "inadvertently" slimming Kate Middleton's waist.

Most popular articles




Mudgee Guardian







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...